Friday, November 13, 2009

Trovon Reed to Auburn

Just letting you all know, Trovon Reed just committed to Auburn. He is the No. 37 high school player in the country according to Rivals.com, and the No. 5 wide receiver... And just to point out, I'm the second to report this :)  --  (Rivals beat me to it)

Reed is the No. 1 ranked player in the state of Lousianna. He joins Shon Coleman (Mississippi) and Michael Dyer (Arkansas) as the third player to commit to Auburn that sits atop his state's prep rankings. Three Mr. Football's in one class is pretty special. And the Tigers could also land South Carolina's Mr. Football, Marcus Lattimore. But we'll see.

I think Reed's commitment will be HUGE is swaying Lache Seastrunk to Auburn, if he's not already sold. 

CJ Spiller deserves the Heisman

And here's just one explanation of why, (all you really have to do is watch even ONE Clemson game - he's absolutely amazing and is easily the most dynamic player in college football. Remember Reggie Bush? Spiller is just as fast but with better vision and a little tougher), per a member of Rivals.com:

Copied from a rivals post

Teddy Heffner on Talk Radio in Columbia makes a good point in reference to all-purpose yards in that a crappy team that gets scored on all the time with a guy who returns 5 kicks a game can get 100 all purpose yds at 20yds a return. It is a good point but it has resulted in many, like Teddy, dismissing much of CJ's production because of the term "all-purpose" that goes with his yardage and the scenario above that they associate with it.

In order to relieve CJ of the all-purpose "bias", what I have done below is take all of Spiller’s kick returns and subtract 20yds from each one. In other words, if he had a return for 50yds, I subtracted 20 and only counted 30yds in his stats. Call the first 20 return yards "junk yards" because they are common for returners, so let's not count them. For example, the player returning 5 kicks at 20 yards a pop who gets credit for 100 all purpose yards would actually get credit for 0 yards in my revised numbers for Spiller below. Fair enough?

Spiller has 15 kick returns. If we take away 20yds per return that results in 300 yds that will be removed from his total yardage below. For comparison sake, I added the stats for the other 2 front runners in the Heisman race without altering Ingram and Tebow's stats in any way. Here they are.

------- Touches -- Total Yds -- TDs--- Yds Per Touch -- Touches Per TD --

Spiller-- 177 ------ 1,494* ---- 12 ------- 8.4 ------------ 14.7 ---

Ingram--- 199 ------ 1,364 ----- 11 ------- 6.8 ------------ 18.0 ---

Tebow---- 328 ------ 2,109 ----- 20 ------- 6.4 ------------ 16.4 ---

*Note ? 300 kick return yards of CJ's 1,794 total yds were removed per my explanation above.

What jumps out at you? Here's my list...

1. First of all it is the yards per touch. He is producing approximately 30% more yards per touch than Tebow and Ingram, even when you don’t count those 300 return yards. If I had included those return yards he would have averaged 10.1 yds per touch.

2. Look at the number of touches that result in a TD for each player. CJ scores a touchdown every 14.7 times he touches the ball. It takes Ingram 18 touches to get a touch down and Tebow 16.4 touches to get one. That said, which player's hands would you want the ball in when you need a score?

3. Keep in mind Tebow’s stats include passing yards & passing TDs which significantly skew things when comparing a QB to any other skill position. A good QB's total yards and TDs typically triple those of a running back or receiver. That makes Spiller’s numbers in comparison to a Heisman QB even more impressive. CJ still smokes him in TDs produced per touch and yds gained per touch even though I removed 300 of CJ's kick return yards.

4. CJ Spiller has been hurt since game one. As a result, he has played very sparingly against teams that we blew out. He had only 5 carries against Middle Tenn St., 9 carries against Wake Forest & 5 carries against Coastal Carolina. What that means is that his stats are not padded in games we played weaker opponents. His stats above were compiled almost entirely against our best opponents in what amounts to about 6 games, not 9.

5. Building on #4... CJ’s best games have come against our greatest competition. For example, of the 3 opponents Clemson played currently ranked in the top 12 (Georgia Tech, TCU & Miami), CJ Spiller averaged 177 yds from scrimmage per game with an average of 264 all-purpose yards per game and 4 TDs. Here are his Yds From Scrimmage/All Purpose Yds/ TDs for each: GT: 156/256/1, TCU: 191/227/1, Miami: 185/310/2. Find another player in the country that has numbers even remotely close to that CONSISTENTLY against top 10 competition.

Given the above stats, I think it becomes even more clear who the best player in college football is. Who would you pay the most to see play? Who makes you hold your breath the most, EVERY TIME he touches the ball? Who steps up for his team the most in the games that matter the most? Whose hands do you most want the ball in if you have one play left in the game and need a score? That is who should win the Heisman trophy.

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Another major football commitment on the horizon?

If you follow recruiting, you're well-aware that Lousianna's top prospect Trovon Reed is expected to announce his collegiate intentions tommorow morning at 10 a.m. CT. The folks at Rivals expect that he'll sign with Auburn. 

This would be huge for the Tigers, as he is the best in a state that is loaded with talent and incredibly difficult for anyone but LSU to pull from. He is ranked as one of the top fifty players in the country and top ten receivers in the country. If he does what most expect and commits to Auburn, he will come in and likely make a similar impact as Onterrio McCalebb has this year. 

BUT HERE'S THE KEY: if Reed commits to Auburn, it will pave the way for Lache Seastrunk to follow in his footsteps. The two are very close, like brothers, and say they would like to go to the same school, but that it's only an ideal. There are quite a few people who say Seastrunk has cooled on Auburn and is now looking heavily to the West Coast, like USC. I find this difficult to believe. 

This is a kid who has consistently recruited FOR Auburn in his visits to other schools. Although Marcus Lattimore, fellow top running back recruit, recently said he doesn't expect Seastrunk to "come" to Auburn, I think the Tigers are likely still atop his list. I just don't see a guy as sharp as he is forgetting the connection he has with Coach Luper and the Auburn family. I think he has planned his recruitment out very well and to the T, and that he'll end up surprising some folks with his commitment to the Tigers later. But I guess that's just my gut feeling.

But since I mentioned Lattimore, I'll also say that the Tigers are putting on a full-court press for his signature in February and are making a big impression. I think it will likely come down to Auburn and South Carolina for him. And the Gamecocks will be tough to beat.

Auburn already has Michael Dyer committed, and I think either Lattimore or Seastrunk would compliment him well, but not both. I don't see how it could be possible for Reed, Dyer, Seastrunk and Lattimore to all be major players in ANY offense at the same time, not to mention guys like McCalebb, DeAngelo Benton, Darvin Adams and Emory Blake, who will almost certainly be factors.

At any rate, it appears to be a good situation for the Tigers to be in. My prediction: Auburn lands Reed tomorrow, then Seastrunk later. And if that happens, expect four-star safety Ahmad Dixon to follow suit.

Are you ready for Tiger Bball? You should be!

Before I write this, I want to say that I really enjoyed the Tommy West vent I posted below and completely agree with him...

That said, folks, get ready for Auburn basketball because the Tigers are going to be very good in the near future. Yesterday, Coach Jeff Lebo added some serious talent to an already talented team. 

Remember Shawn Kemp - the former NBA All-Star? Well his son is also a star and just inked with Auburn. His name is also Shawn Kemp and he's going to be a force to be reckoned with. He's a four-star, 6'9" 235 pound power forward and should provide a much-needed presence down low in the post.

The Tigers also added a four-star small forward named Allen Payne. He's 6'6" and is extremely talented. 

To go along with Sophomore sensation Frankie Sullivan, senior leader Dwayne Reed, the sharp shooter Tay Waller and the magic man Lucas Hargrove (who is similar to Rasheem Barrett, only more consistent), the Tigers should win at least 20 games this year and make the NCAA tourney - that's my prediction, go ahead and write it down. 

Monday, November 9, 2009

Dare I say, I told you so?

Another of my columns from The Citizen of East Alabama:


When Auburn hired defensive guru Gene Chizik to replace Tommy Tuberville late last year, there was an overwhelming number of people who not only disagreed with the decision, but made fun and argued that it was the worst decision that could have been made. It’s not really my style to gloat, but I was not one of those people.

I’ll admit, when I first heard the news I was not excited. I got a text from my dad confirming the news and I was like, “Are you kidding me?” I wanted someone who had a proven track record for putting up big numbers on offense. I wasn’t thrilled to have a 5-19 coach come to the Plains.

But then I began doing my homework. I read A LOT of stories about Chizik and what he had to overcome at Iowa State. I quickly understood that it was a program in disarray before he arrived and he started 11 true freshman while there. It was obvious why he hadn’t won many games. I also looked at his experience and record as a defensive coordinator, which nobody can deny is second to none. Who else can say they coached three straight Thorpe Award winners? Had consecutive undefeated seasons with two different schools?

Then I began to hear what former players were saying about Gene Chizik. Carlos Rogers spoke out in support, telling how Auburn couldn’t have made a better decision. But of course he would say that. He went from virtually unknown on the national scene to becoming the nation’s best defensive back. But when Ronnie Brown and Carnell Williams spoke well of him, saying he is a player’s coach that really knows how to get players to rally together and unite behind him, I was sold. Then came Kirk Herbstreit’s thoughts of how good of a fit Chizik would be at Auburn. Well that was just icing on the cake.

So I began telling people that I was sold and I thought he would be a good one. I can’t express to you how much criticism I got around here for supporting him. People called me an “Auburn homer,” and said I was simply trying to convince myself that it was a good hire. They went on to call him Cheez-it, and other such names. But I continued to believe in the new coach, even if I didn’t have much of a choice.

One thing people don’t seem to understand is that it does no good for people to criticize and belittle their own, so they might as well support them. While this was not my rationale, it was something I tried to impress upon other Auburn fans who weren’t quite as keen on Chizik as I was.

So as the offseason progressed, Chizik went on to hire the most prolific, up-and-coming offensive coordinator in the game, Gus Malzahn, and then hired two big-gun recruiters as offensive assistants, in Trooper Taylor and Curtis Luper, and a defensive coordinator, Ted Roof, who shared very similar beliefs as he, one of the best in the business. Then he pulled in Jeff Grimes, a laid back offensive line coach that many claim to be the best recruiter on the staff. He followed that up with a surprise hire out of North Carolina: the silent assassin Tommy Thigpen – one of the best recruiters in the country.

Over a span of just two months, Gene Chizik had come in and hired one of the best coaching staffs in the country, then followed it up with upgrading an already solid recruiting class to top 20, including pulling several four-star recruits that didn’t even have Auburn on their radar before he was hired.

Since then, all he has done is take a squad with severe depth issues and win seven games, including a few that Auburn wasn’t supposed to win this year. And he’s done it all with record-setting offensive numbers. The Tigers will now move into Amen Corner at 7-3, with a real shot at beating Georgia in Athens. But then will come the real test: the undefeated Alabama Crimson Tide. Can Chizik fare any better than his predecessor’s 0-36 mark last year? I don’t know. But I do know this: I told you Gene Chizik was a good fit and now you understand.

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Tate's NFL potential

Just wanted to go on the record as saying Ben Tate will be one HELL of an NFL running back. Picture Michael Turner from the Atlanta Falcons. He is big and FAST and will be great. I've been thinking this for a while but just now thought to put it in writing... i may even write a column about it in the future. If he'd have had the same opportunity last year as he did this year, he'd be more in the Heisman race than Mark Ingram at Alabama.

In terms of NFL potential, Tate may be the best Auburn has had since Bo Jackson. He's every bit as good as Rudi Johnson was, just with much better speed. He reminds me of a faster Stephen Davis.

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Stay strong, Auburn family, stay strong. This will pass - I promise. So we've lost three games in a row..

I want you all to keep in mind that it's not the end of the world, first of all. Second, there's no reason why the Tigers can't come out and beat Ole Miss. 

But what I really want to talk about is Auburn's quarterback situation. I've heard a lot of talk about "bring in Neil Caudle." Well, I disagree. I think Chris Todd can still get it done. Like many of you, probably, I see that Auburn offensive woes don't trace back solely to Todd. And his performance isn't indicative of his talent level or ability. In fact, I think it's more telling of just how little depth Auburn has at offensive line. It's the line's performance that has made Todd look so bad.

There were plenty of instances I can think of from the LSU game where Todd made a check at the line to account for a coming blitz, only to be let down by a veteran offensive lineman or back who was supposed to block a blitzing defender. The result: he was sacked or was forced to fumble the ball because he was blindsided by the defender. Due to this kind of play from the line, Todd has tried to force balls in certain situations and throw earlier than he should. This is part of the cause for his recent interceptions. Now don't get me wrong. He has made some poor choices, such as the final throw of the Kentucky game and the interception he threw against LSU into double coverage. He never would have attempted those throws in the first four or five games this year.

There's also poor receiver play. Auburn's receivers got away with some sloppy route running in the first few games. But as the competition has improved, our receiver inadequacies have been exposed. Our guys must learn to run crisper routes. I think we might see a little more of the younger guys, like Emory Blake and Philip Lutzenkirchen, in the coming games.

So that's that.

Of course, Neil Caudle has played pretty well when given the chance. As well he should, since he was one of the top seven quarterbacks in the country coming out of high school - the guy was incredible and won a lot of games. He entered college football alongside guys like Tim Tebow, Josh Freeman, Matt Stafford and Jevan Snead. He was considered just as good, if not better than, all but Stafford and Tebow. 

So why hasn't he won the QB job the whole time he's been at Auburn? I don't know. But do I believe in him as a backup? Heck yeah.But I also believe Chris Todd is right choice to be our starting quarterback and I think he'll snap out of his slump, as will the offensive line. I just hope the receivers will do the same and find a way to get open so Todd can hit them when the time comes.

Friday, October 2, 2009

Commitments should always be honored

There are some things in this life that should never happen. I believe that if you make a commitment to something or someone and it holds true to you, that you should try your best to stay true to it. Simply put, do what you say you’re going to do. It’s just the way I feel.

I could take this to many different levels – everything from relationships to taking on job responsibilities to playing on a team.

I could easily fill these 20-some-odd column-inches with ramblings about relationships – believe me – but I’d rather talk about the other stuff.

A commitment is a promise. It’s promise not only to yourself, but also to everyone else involved with whatever you’re doing. It’s a promise that you’ll be there when asked and give your best effort. It’s a promise that if things aren’t going your way, you’ll still be there and try to help in any way you can.

If you make a commitment to your employer, you must realize that not only is the employer counting on you, but so are your coworkers and so are the customers or recipients of whatever service you provide. Just like on a team, where your teammates are counting on you.

Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying you have to be perfect, because nobody is perfect. If you’re on a baseball team, you are going to make mistakes – it’s inevitable and absolutely impossible to avoid. If you play baseball and fail 70 percent of the time, you’re considered a phenomenal hitter. But regardless of what happens, you should continue to show up and give your best effort, if not for you, for everyone else who made that same commitment to the team that you once made.

I’ve recently had experience with commitment issues in several aspects of my life. One aspect involved my job and another involved a sports team I’m playing on and happen to also be coaching.

Without getting into specifics in regard to my job, I’ll simply say that when people you work with don’t honor their commitments, it puts a strain on every other employee in that company – because one person generally can’t take on someone else’s responsibilities while continuing to fulfill their own. Otherwise, the first person was probably not even needed in the first place. And if that person isn’t going to be there – barring an emergency – prior notification should be given to allow others time to prepare. Anything less is unacceptable and just not fair.

As for teams, if someone signs up to play on the team, he or she should make sure that they can attend the games and if the team decides to hold a practice, they should try to be there. If someone doesn’t show up, it’s not just hurting that person’s game, it’s hurting the entire team. How are team members supposed to learn each other’s strengths and weaknesses and how to play together? How are team members supposed to learn to count on one another? And as for quitting the team… if somebody wants to quit, that person shouldn’t just do so on a whim, leaving everyone else on the team hung out to dry. That person should at least give prior notification, just like with a job.

The bottom line is that I hate it when people say they’re going to do something and then don’t do it. Too many times I’ve been in a situation where I have counted on somebody to do something – because they said they would – only to find out later that they didn’t do it. I believe that people should be held accountable for what they say they are going to do and there should be no excuses. There is plenty of room for explanation, but not excuses.

Someone very wise once told me something about excuses that I’ll never forget. I can’t exactly print the maxim in this publication, but in short, everybody’s got one. So rather than offering an excuse that nobody even wants, just keep it to yourself and make sure that you’re never in a position to even give one. Do what you say you’re going to do and honor your commitments. It’s amazing how much can get done when that happens.

Friday, September 25, 2009

All I wanted was a hotdog...

Friday night at the Russell County vs. Central football game, from about the second quarter on, there was only one thing I could consistently think of: food. I didn’t get to eat much before the game and I ate an early lunch.

So you might say, ‘Why didn’t you get something to eat at halftime?’ Well, I was covering the game for The Citizen and halftime is when we tally up all the yards and statistics and think about what happened during the first half. There really isn’t much time to trek down to the concession stand, wait in line and get back in time to be ready to cover the second half, especially if you’re recording each play.

Anyway, when the game was over, I did my best to hurry up and catch Coach Rico White for an interview while continuing to take pictures, which is what I was doing this particular game. As soon as I was finished, I headed over to the concession stand and was relieved to find that there were still people inside and I was even more pleased that there was a big tray filled to the brim with hotdogs.

It was most definitely a sight for hungry eyes.

So I walked up and told the ladies inside I would like to purchase a hotdog please. This is where they crushed me. They replied that they are no longer selling food. I was stunned.

What, then, is the tray FULL of hotdogs doing sitting there? I made sure I heard them correctly and asked for clarification, “There’s nothing left for sale,” while staring at the dogs. They said that’s right, and said they were sorry.

ARE YOU KIDDING ME?

Last time I checked, the Russell County school system was not exactly rich, to put it nicely. Now I’m not sure exactly where the concession money goes, but if it’s to the athletics department, kids on the varsity football team have to wear jerseys that are so old that the numbers don’t all even look the same. Some of the helmets don’t even have team decals on both sides, meaning that inevitably, some kids probably don’t even have a helmet of their own, but rather have to share with other reserves. Are you telling me THEY don’t want my money? Or that THEY couldn’t use it?

Or maybe the money goes into the school system’s general fund. Or maybe it just goes to the Athletic Booster Club. My point is that the money surely goes somewhere to help the students in some way.

All this and they can’t sell me one of the 50 hotdogs that were left?! I don’t get it. Was it a function of selfishness? Did the ladies inside want to take them home to their family? Or did they want them for themselves? I don’t understand. Or maybe they were saving them for the football players. But isn’t the whole point of the concession stand to SELL food and drinks? Isn’t that why they cooked the food in the first place? If not, then I would certainly like to know what it’s there for.

The school system is in proration and they can’t sell me a freakin hotdog. Not to mention that I probably would have bought three. I know it’s only three dollars (I think), but I’d be willing to bet that I’m not the only person this has happened to.

Whatever. Explain it to the kid who’s only got a decal on one side of his helmet.

Thursday, September 10, 2009

I hate Monday holidays

If there’s one thing that really screws up my week here at the Citizen of East Alabama, it’s a holiday that either falls on, or is observed on, a Monday. And it’s not just me – it’s everyone who works here.

The way our week is laid out, it begins on Wednesday, the day after we go to press, or in other words, send the files to the printer so we can send out the newspaper on Thursday. Wednesday is when we have all of our meetings, talk about what we’ll write that week and how much space we’ll have, etc. Then the later part of Wednesday, and all day Thursday and Friday, we reporters go out and find more stories and write the stories we talked about on Wednesday.

Monday is supposed to be reserved for anything else that might suddenly come up – like breaking news – and we also use it to write about whatever happened over the weekend. Now, it’s inevitable that something will always come up every Monday or some source we need to talk to won’t call us back until Monday, and sometimes even Tuesday.

Basically, Monday is the catch-all day that we use to basically gear up for the storm that is press day, which like I said before, is every Tuesday. We NEED our Mondays around here.

So when there are holidays observed on Monday’s where we can’t come into the office, it really cramps our week and puts a tight crunch on all of us. Not only do we have to come in early on Tuesday morning to make sure we have covered all of our bases, but we also have to make sure nothing happened on Monday that requires our attention and make sure we are ready to put the newspaper together, period.

This past weekend, we had to cover high school football games on Friday. For those of us who had plans and were gone all weekend after that, it meant coming in Tuesday morning and writing the story of those games , in addition to finishing anything else that needed to be done, before the paper could be sent off to the press. It was either that or write our stories off the clock, which I’ve done many times, but obviously would prefer not to do if I had a choice.

So what to do about it? I suggest that for the country as a whole, we start observing holidays on Fridays. It makes sense.

Not only would that preserve the traditional beginning of the week that so may people require to keep a regular schedule of events, but it would also remove people’s desire to take the Friday before a Monday holiday off. I mean, seriously, how many people try to turn a three-day weekend into a four-day weekend by doing just that? I’d say it’s probably a lot.

If holidays were observed on Friday, I don’t think people would be very inclined to also take Thursday off – it would be too obvious, I guess. And does anybody really think people would go ahead and take Monday off, too, to make it a four-day weekend. I don’t think so. I know I certainly wouldn’t do that. I would rather go ahead and get my week started right, and not have to play that furious game of catch-up I so love.

Maybe I’m in the minority in this, but I sure know it would make my life, as it is now, a lot easier. And anyone else who works with me in this particular weekly publication would almost certainly agree with me. I know this, because we’ve all already complained about it together first thing this morning (which was Tuesday, when I wrote this, although you’re probably reading it on Thursday). But I guess it would be just one more thing that will never get done. Why? Well, because it makes too much sense, obviously.

Monday, August 31, 2009

Music is my coping mechanism

For as long as I can remember, music has been a big part of my life. There was a time when I played music and there was a time when I actually sang in a choir. I think those experiences helped me develop a good base knowledge about music – that, and growing up the younger brother of a teenager who was big into music during those very impressionable years of mine. For that reason, 80s hair band rock is the foundation of my musical taste, but it has certainly grown since I’ve come into my own.

Since then I’ve expanded to have a VERY wide variety of musical tastes. I’ll listen to anything from Eminem, to Atlanta Rhythm Section, to Patty Griffin, to Kent DuChaine, Foreigner and Guns ‘N’ Roses.

Nowadays, more often than not I turn to music as a coping mechanism with the world around me. If something is going well, I listen to music that is upbeat and very positive. But if things are going badly, I tend to listen to slower, more emotional music that really encapsulates how I feel. The way I look at it, it’s not so much me identifying with the music as the music identifying with me. I think it helps me deal with whatever comes along to know and hear that someone else has felt the same way and gone through the same thing as me. I guess you could call it dwelling, but I’d rather think of it as dealing. It helps me get over whatever it was that got me down in the first place and it is remarkably comforting.

For instance, when I feel heartbroken, I might listen to some slow Eric Clapton or Bad Company, or maybe something altogether different. Or if I’m feeling like I could conquer the world, you might find me listening to Guns ‘N’ Roses. I’m sure you get the point.

I have recently tried to help others find their musical coping mechanisms. My mother is someone who grew up with music as a big part of her life. At one point, she was a very talented lead singer in a band and I think music was probably an emotional outlet for her, as it is with most musicians. But she has stopped listening to music for the most part. The same is essentially true for someone else I know and both have a lot of stress in their lives. I think listening to music is a natural stress reliever and both could greatly benefit from re-finding the music, so to speak.

It’s kind of funny to me, but they say smell is the sense that is most associated with memory. I won’t argue with that, but I will say that for me, sound, or certain songs play on my memories like a drum. Probably the same as with most people, I go through phases where I’ll listen to a certain song over and over again until I wear it out. Well, if I happened to be playing that certain song during a definitive period in my life, I’ll tend to associate that song with that period.

I can remember playing one particular song repeatedly every time I was headed over to see my now ex-girlfriend. Well, low and behold, I heard this particular song three years later and it took me right back to that girl. I immediately remembered exactly how I felt when I was headed to her house, exactly the mood I used to be in and exactly why I used to play it.

There was another time when a song hit me this way. When I was in middle school, I used to listen to a particular radio station every morning as I would eat my cereal while getting ready for school. Well, needless to say, I heard one of the songs that used to always play on that station and suddenly I felt as if I should be eating a bowl of Kellogg’s Frosted Mini Wheats.

These are very vivid memories. But I digress. The point is that music is my release and I use it to relate to the world as I know it.

Oddly enough, I think cutting the grass is another natural stress reliever for me. But I’ll save that for a different column on a different day.

Monday, August 10, 2009

Be like a duck... but don't fret if it doesn't work out

If there’s one lesson I’ve learned in my lifetime, it’s that things may not always work out the way you would like. In fact, it can be a rarity that things actually do work out the way you think they should, and more often than not, it takes a lot of tough behind-the-scenes work.

I recently came up with what I considered a long-term plan to reach a goal that was important to me. Through a few weeks, everything was going “according to plan,” you could say. Up until recently, when the plan basically came to a screeching halt, which, as you can probably imagine, is a bit upsetting. It would be easy for me to get down and feel sorry about it, blah, blah, but I had to look at history and simply say, things happen for a reason, and go from there. I know that throughout my lifetime, this has happened on many more than one occasion.

My parents have always told me that hard work pays off. A friend once told me to always be like a duck: cool, calm and collected on the surface, but paddle like hell underneath. I took both pieces of advice to heart and have really tried to be like the duck.

I don’t usually touch subjects like what I’m about to say, but they say the Lord works in mysterious ways, and I believe it’s true. There have been plenty of times in my life when my plan didn’t work out, only to find out later that God had a much better plan for me.

For the first 18 years of my life, I practiced every day and thought I was going to be a professional baseball player. It was my plan. I ate, slept and breathed baseball. I lived it. But as soon as I got to college, for some reason the rigors of the sport just didn’t appeal to me and I decided not to play anymore. To this day I wonder about that decision, but I’m comfortable with it.

In economics, they teach you a very important concept known as “opportunity cost.” But it’s much more than just an economic concept. The idea is that basically, everything you do costs you something, whether it’s money, time or experience. For instance, if you’re faced with a decision of watching TV or going out with friends, and you choose to go out with friends, the opportunity cost of that decision was the TV program you missed. Every decision you make has an opportunity cost or consequence.

There is so much I would have missed if I had chosen to pursue baseball. During that time, I really came into my own as a person and found out who I was. Some people find this out sooner than I did, but when you dedicate so much of your life to one thing, it begins to define you. So for me, separation from the sport helped me redefine myself. And in this case, the opportunity cost of becoming me was very small, and for that I can honestly say deciding not to play baseball anymore happened for a reason, although I didn’t see it so clearly at the time.

Regardless of what happens to you in your lifetime, you have to keep in mind that when one door closes, another one usually opens up. You may have to search for it and it may take some time to find, but as long as you keep your eyes open, things will usually work out. It’s a comforting viewpoint to have, and it’s basically the same principal as believing in a religion that cannot be proven. It’s about faith – faith that if you work hard for what you believe in and what you want, things will work out in your favor.

But as you work, keep in mind that it doesn’t matter who you are, what kind of job you have, how much money you make or what you look like, some things just aren’t meant to be. And on the flip side, if it is meant to be, then there’s no need to worry.

Friday, July 10, 2009

Going green is easier than you think...

One of my columns from the Citizen of East Alabama earlier this year:


All the talk nowadays is about going green. The concern for our environment is growing very rapidly, as it should be. And the concern should not necessarily be for yourself, but rather for your children and grandchildren.

I consider myself to be one of the more “green” people I know of. Now don’t get me wrong, I don’t own a hybrid vehicle and I still take long showers. But there are some little things each and every one of us can do to help out just a little bit. And together, WE can make a difference. The key to it all is this: the way I do it doesn’t really interfere with my everyday life.

It’s really becoming easier and easier to be green, as companies are actually catering to that “lifestyle,” albeit mostly for PR purposes. Clorox has its “Green Works” brand and Arm & Hammer has its “Essentials” brand.

Today, I’m just going to talk about soaps and paper, because I think those are the things you can change that are least disruptive to your life, plus I’m severely limited on space.

The first thing I did when I started to go green is replace my regular soaps with environmentally friendly soaps. That includes dishwashing detergent, laundry detergent and even shampoo. Soap is one of the worst things for the environment that people don’t really know about. The reason is because of the extremely high phosphorus (or phosphates) levels.

It makes sense if you think about it. When you wash your car out in the driveway or yard, what happens to the runoff? If you live anywhere near a water source like a stream or lake, I guarantee that soap will end up there. You might say, ‘but the ground filters it.” Maybe it does at first, but when it rains the phosphates seep farther and farther toward the watershed (or lake, etc.).

The same thing happens on a smaller scale when you’re talking about shampoo, laundry soap, etc. that dumps into the sewer system. It all eventually finds its way to large bodies of water. It’s a fact.

Phosphates stimulate the growth of algae in water, which deplete the oxygen supply in water, which in turn kills plant and fish life. More than half of the phosphorus in this country’s lakes and rivers is estimated to come from detergents and soaps.

I use soaps that are made of natural ingredients and are biodegradable. It should say something on the bottle. The brands I use are Arm & Hammer Essentials laundry detergent (yes, it cleans my clothes very well and it’s cheap), Palmolive dish detergent (it says on the bottle that it’s earth-friendly), Palmolive Pure & Clear dish soap and Suave Naturals shampoo. My hygiene is still top-notch.

Beyond soaps, I recycle everything I can – especially paper. It’s the easiest thing to recycle. And I don’t do it to produce less trash, I do it so that fewer trees will have to be cut down to make more paper. And the biggest culprit? Toilet Paper. Believe it or not, more trees are cut down to make toilet paper than anything else, especially in the United States. Obviously, I can’t recycle my toilet paper, but I can buy partially recycled toilet paper.

I’ve searched far and wide to find a brand that is satisfactory, and I’ll tell you what: not too many of them meet my standards. But I did find one brand that works for me (and my girlfriend, for you ladies). It’s carried at Wal-Mart and it is clearly labeled. I think it’s called White Cloud or something like that. Unlike most other recycled TP, it is soft, absorbent and most importantly, durable.

I truly believe that these minor adjustments in the way I used to do things will make a difference if everybody joins me. Every type of animal is important to our well being as humans, so we must do what we can to help them all survive. And if you don’t think it’s important to help save wildlife… have you ever seen “The Butterfly Effect?” Where do you think that term came from? 

Monday, June 1, 2009

The economy is probably worse than you think...

This is a column I wrote for the Citizen of East Alabama: It ran the week of April 19.


The economy is probably worse than you think

By Skip Hansberger


I thought this was supposed to be a capitalist/market economy, in which you either succeed or fail? Stupid me.

How can the government honestly justify giving bailouts to some of these companies? I could understand "bailing out" the individuals who work(ed) for these companies, who stand to lose their retirement options, etc. But giving the companies money with no real strings attached and expecting them to do the right thing is asinine. And what about the mom and pop stores that are failing? They don't get bailouts. But then again, the government doesn't have money invested in THEM... Ridiculous if you ask me.

The banks are one thing - as far as freeing up credit and loans - but come on, be reasonable (and responsible)!

All these bailouts are doing is sending inflation through the roof! Mark my words, inflation is going to be the biggest problem facing this country in the near future. You can't just keep making dollar bills to throw at (our?) problems.

It's basic economics - supply (effectively equal to the national debt) goes up and value or worth (demand) goes down. The single dollar will soon be worth, what, $.50?? That’s how much money the government has literally created to pump into the economy.

I think if the government honestly wants to help the economy and the future of the country it needs to pump money into education (since it seems hell-bent on pumping OUR money into something).

Also, most people think our jobs are all going overseas. But that's not true. The jobs are still here; they're just different. Technology is on the rise and we, in this country, have done a poor job, as a whole, teaching people how to work those jobs. So immigrants are coming in and doing the things Americans don't yet know how to do (like IT and tech support, etc.).

Jobs are not going overseas; overseas are coming to our jobs.

More of our schools' curriculums need to be expanded to account for this shift in the importance of technology so that the next generation will be ready. Then we (America) can again compete in OUR job market and unemployment will not be such an issue.

People don't seem to understand that there is no quick fix for the problems we are experiencing. Only with time and well thought out and properly invested money will things get better.

Right now, we are being robbed.

I am likely going to have to retire much later in life than the previous generation and even later than the one before that. At least, that is if I am going to rely on Social Security, which will probably not even exist in 30 or 40 years.

So the generation after me, what are they going to do?? Many people in this country are largely ignorant - blissfully ignorant. And most of those who aren’t ignorant are simply shortsighted. Unfortunately, some of them are ruining – I mean, running – our country. And that's a problem that is immeasurable.

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Urban 'Crier' has issues...

Why on Earth would you want to play for this guy? I understand that you'll probably win a lot of games - so if that's what you're all about then by all means... but if you want to play for a quality person who understands the bigger aspects of life and the world, then I must ask, "Why?.."

Check out this article from ESPN.com:



Meyer: Ex-Gators need to support us

ESPN.com news services

Shane Matthews played quarterback at Florida and says he supports the Gators and coach Urban Meyer.

But when Matthews criticized Meyer's game strategy during Florida's upset loss to Mississippi on his radio show last fall, Meyer was not happy. And though he didn't mention Matthews by name in a recent Gator Club appearance, it seemed that his comments about ex-players pledging allegiance to the orange and blue were made with Matthews in mind, the Orlando Sentinel reported.

SEC blog

ESPN.com's Chris Low writes about all things SEC in his conference blog.

• Blog network

"If you want to be critical of a player on our team or a coach on our team you can buy a ticket for seat 37F, you're not welcome back in the football office," Meyer said, according to the report. "You're either a Gator or you're not a Gator."

The rift apparently started when Matthews criticized the offense following the 31-30 loss to Mississippi -- the game that produced Tim Tebow's now-famous postgame speech.

"When I watched the Ole Miss game and Ole Miss played our wide receivers about 90 percent man-to-man, it was a slap in the face to our wide receivers and passing game. I can't understand why we didn't take advantage of that," Matthews said at the time, according to the report.

The Sentinel reported it could not reach Matthews for comment to respond to Meyer's remarks. But in a recent appearance on a radio show in Birmingham, Ala. -- hosted by two former SEC players, Al Del Greco of Auburn and Jay Barker of Alabama -- he stood up for his remarks.

"If [the offense isn't] attacking the weakness of that defense it drives me crazy, that's what set me off early in the season," Matthews said, according to the report. "I am a supporter of this program no matter what, but I'm going to give my opinion when things go wrong. When things go well, I state that as well, but a lot of people don't hear that."

If you want to be critical of a player on our team or a coach on our team you can buy a ticket for seat 37F, you're not welcome back in the football office. You're either a Gator or you're not a Gator.

-- Urban Meyer

Other former college football players in the media came to Matthews' defense, but added that former athletes turned commentators need to be honest to do their jobs.

"Shane, because he bled and sweat for the Gators, has a right to say whatever he wants about the program," former Miami defensive lineman Dan Sileo said, according to the report.

"Urban Meyer's not a Gator. He's a caretaker of the Gator program," Sileo said. "Most times these coaches think they're the programs, but really, the program is the players. That's the problem I have with coaches whose egos get too big for their britches. If Urban doesn't like it, that's too bad."

Meyer came to Florida from Utah after the 2004 season and has won a pair of BCS national championships, in 2006 and 2008.

Matthews says he'll keep supporting Meyer and keep voicing his opinions, according to the report.

"The last thing I want to do is stir up anything because there's nothing there," Matthews said, the Sentinel reported. "It's almost crazy when I sit 

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Tiger Prowl came through Phenix City today...

For those of you who are unaware, the Auburn coaching staff has taken an unprecedented approach to recruiting. Instead of using this time period, which is generally alloted for seven coaches to go out on recruit evaluations, to send coaches out to as many schools as possible, the Auburn staff has decided to group all seven together and send them in a stretch Hummer (decked out with AU magnets, flags, etc.) to select schools around the state. 

They say this sends a message that Auburn is no longer going to be beaten in Alabama. And I AGREE.

I got the awesome opportunity to meet and speak with all seven coaches for about an hour and a half today as they went about their business in the school. I was only able to get an interview with Luper because they were so short on time, and only had time for a couple questions; I wish I could have asked about ten more... But anyway, They are absolutely as cool as can be. 

The plan was also for them to go to Smiths Station High, Auburn and Opelika Highs, Stanhope Elmore and Prattville High today. I know they made it to Smiths Station (for about 10 minutes), but I don't know about the others.

Basically what they did at Central High (Phenix City) is sit and talk with different coaches (about them, their families and different players/prospects), meet administrators, tour the facilities and watch kids if they are working out or practicing, etc. A few kids tried to converse with the coaches but all they replied with was War Eagle before the HS coach took them aside and explained the rules.

Today, coaches Luper, Taylor, Roof, Lolley, Malzahn, Rocker and Thigpen were on the Prowl.

Oh, and by the way, I asked Coach Roof why he had a different shirt than everyone else yesterday and the day before and he said he spilled coffee on it (haha!) and his wife had to get it dry cleaned. So that's that.

Check out this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDvFrQLh4TU

I talked to a High School coach today...


and he confirmed that AU DEFINITELY has some silent commitments. Granted, I can assure that NONE are from his school, but he did say he has recently attended a coaching clinic at Auburn and plans to bring his team to a passing camp there soon. Apparently he has had some contact with these coaches and, like I said, is positive we have some silent commitments. Don't know exactly how he would know, but he said it.

I didn't try to get names, but the way I see it, if they are silent, they are silent for a reason and I would hate to be the one to violate that, right?? Not to mention my previous suspicion about what LB7 said a few days ago ( I said I was pretty sure one of the big three guys we've been talking about was one of those silent commits) - I have no further proof and actually am less sure than I was when i posted that. BUT, what this coach told me makes me feel pretty good.

He also gave me some insights as to how Satan recruits. And he said basically everything we talk about as far as helping family members find jobs and suitcases "appearing" on doorsteps is true.

IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THIS COACH IS NOT AN AUBURN FAN
.

Monday, April 6, 2009

Check it out:

I know this is a copout as far as a new blog post goes, but I enjoyed reading this article and made a few personal references to Auburn and the possible complacency of the Tommy Tuberville staff.

It's an easy comparison to make, but I guess it's just nice to see that Auburn is not the only school that suffered due to key coaching changes (ie, Borges, Franklin, etc.)

The bottom line is this: Tuberville and his staff have never really produced great offenses. They usually have a strong running game and extremely stout defense. Nine out of ten times, this results in wins. But then there's that tenth time when other teams stack the box, stop your run and begin to wear out your defense (= loss). That's what happened last season and I absolutely loved Tommy Tuberville as Auburn's head man, but it's good to see a defensive guru at the helm who has connections on the offensive side of the ball. Hopefully, when some of his guys begin to leave for other jobs, he'll continue bringing in good coaches who have good chemistry with his other coaches.

Anyway, here's the link:

http://insider.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?entryID=3971150&name=feldman_bruce&action=login&appRedirect=http://insider.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?entryID=3971150&name=feldman_bruce

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Oh so close...

If you saw last night's NIT quarterfinal basketball game between Auburn and Baylor, you wouldn't have had to watch ANY of Auburn's previous games to understand what the season was like. 

What I mean by that is this: that game was a microcosm of Auburn's season in every way. Falling behind early. Mounting a furious second-half come-back. Falling short because the team can't hit crucial free throws. Not only does that describe several of Auburn's losses, but also the season as a whole.

We all knew it would come down to free throws, one way or another - whether it be last night or the next game or the finals. Quite simply, you can't win a championship if you can't hit free throws. And if you can't rebound to boot, forget about it.

That said, Auburn players played their hearts out last night, at least, that is, in the second half of the second half. The team did a good job keeping it close the entire game and played well in the first half, answering each Baylor run with an equal and opposite run. Then appeared to just coast through the first ten minutes of the second half.

I can't count the number of Auburn players I didn't see in the paint going for offensive rebounds. If you're Jeff Lebo, that has to be infuriating. I know I was yelling at a few players. Guys would pull up and shoot a three, then back off like they knew it was going in - the only problem was that most of them didn't go in. Which brings up another problem: why couldn't Auburn feed the ball into the paint for some inside scoring?

Now, I know Baylor played great defense last night and their 2-3 zone gave Auburn fits. But the way to beat that is to drive to the basket. Where were Frankie Sullivan, Dwayne Reed and Rasheem Barrett early in the second half? These are guys that have to have a presence. Especially Sully and Reed when the play PG. Drive the basket and if there's no shot, kick it out for the open three.

Now let's talk specifics.

The last three minutes of that game were some of the most exciting that i've seen in Auburn basketball. To be down by seven that late and come back to have the chance to win the game on it's final shot - without fouling - was spectacular. 

Quantez Robertson earned his defensive reputation in the final 30 seconds.

I believe Reed played very well when the game was basically on the line (save for his two missed free throws with 8 seconds left that would have tied the game). The way he drove the basket and put Auburn within 2, then drove again, drawing the foul to give himself that opportunity... that was awesome. I'll bet you nobody spends more time this offseason shooting free throws than Dwayne Reed. If it were me, that sort of things could change my whole career. Just think if someone with his ability to make plays could be accountable at the charity stripe.....

This brings us to the final two possessions. 

Who would have thought Auburn would force two turnovers, capitalize on one to bring the game to within 1, then have a Baylor guard who shoots 87 percent from the line miss his final shot to give us a chance to win? Certainly not me.

Robertson got the rebound on that miss, drove the court and dished to Barret, who stepped around Robertson and another guy who created a screen, to finally put up a potential game-winning three. Of course, he missed. But you have to give him a little credit for taking the shot. After all, he was the hottest guy on the court in those last five minutes. Not one whole minute before that shot, he brought the Tigers to within three when he sunk a three.

But here's my question: wouldn't you like to have seen him try to get inside and pull one of his classic "jump inside, stop, jump and fade away" shots from the free throw line? I just know he would have made it - as usual - and it would have sent the game to OT. 

Do I like our chances in OT? Yes. After Auburn got going and began playing like we know we all know they're capable of, there would have been no stopping them. I think just the accomplishment of sending that game to OT would have sparked the team to greatness.

But that's all moot. Plus, how much can you expect of a team when they only have 6 seconds to get the ball down the court and get off a shot?

All-in-all, I'm very proud of this team. I just hope they take it upon themselves to develop some consistency in shooting free throws during the offseason.